Back to Headlines✕
Phil. employment contract update
The Philippine government Department of Migrant Worker DMW (formerly POEA), who is in charge of ruling over Filipino seafarer employment terms and conditions internationally,
announced last 7. July 2026 the signing of newly finalized seabased employment conditions.
The new conditions are the result of Philippine tripartite meetings, comprised of Philippine government departments, labor represented by AMOSUP,
and the local maritime agency industry represented by ALMA group.
New conditions have not yet been publicied, but what we know already is that Mental Health is now included under occupational diseases.
Therefore, for the first time, a broader look must be given at Pre-Employment Medical Examination PEME, which up to now focused on physical conditions of a seafarer,
whereas psycological diagnostics were limited on 16PF.
The Philippine government Department of Health, being in charge of PEME, is expected to roll out a wider, though compputer based diagnostic tool for diagnosing mental illnesses.
Shall we see how much a revised PEME will disrupt our industry, failing many otherwise fit ex-crew's medical fitness....
Written by Stefan Schmitt
Back to Headlines✕
Back to Headlines✕
AI powering up our crewing database
AI has now reached our local self-developped crewing database «manila_base».
Initially using Llama artificial intelligence text processing, it generates prompts using database stored texts, then analyses sentiments, such as
- performance report commenting
- encoded crew operator feedbacks
- medical findings
or a more detailed example, it interprets risks associated with BMI from height and weight in relation to age and onboard duties.
The idea is to give support to crewing decision makers, for our Pre-Employment Vetting, to better understand which is the best seafarer to suggest for a vacant position.
Written by Stefan Schmitt
Back to Headlines✕
Back to Headlines✕
Ship Owners above standard
It is expected that some owners may resort to flagging out their vessels to non-EU flag further reducing the total number of officers to be replaced and we may actually come into a range that is manageable with the slack being picked up by mainly East-European, Ukraine and Russian Officers.
An EU ban on marine safety is more likely to be negative than positive. From the perspective of EMSA/EU the system is as strong as its weakest link. From the Industry perspective it seems for the EMSA 99% Philippine MARINA compliance is not fully compliant.
Knowing the weaknesses in the education system owners already only deal with graduates of the Top-10 schools and/or subject cadets to additional training before going on board their vessels. Owners do not take Certificate of Competence (COC) of new recruits at face value. The Industry will look at track record, check references and possibly subject newly recruited officers to further testing. Interesting here - for many European owners the minimum standards as defined in the STCW convention are not even high enough as they require a higher standard. So they invest and invested in additional training and enhancement programs here in the Philippines.
The Norwegian Ship-owners run a very successful cadet training scheme and a training center and the major Japanese owners operate their own schools and training centers. The Dutch administer Dutch maritime vocational level exams to a maritime college they support before students can qualify for cadet position on board ships of Dutch owners. So over the years the Industry has been training Filipino Officers on board and ashore to the required level. They have evaluations systems in place to monitor progress and now sail with a pool of reliable and competent Filipino officers.
Under a ban scenario the EU owners will have to be replaced by officers unfamiliar with the operations and ships. There is a trisect relation between familiarity/experience and safety.
In the short/medium term marine safety is most likely to suffer.
At a meeting in Europe a Nordic country challenged EMSA to come up with safety data that shows Filipino Officers are over represented in marine accident statistics. Despite the load of safety data kept by EMSA no such data is available.
In fairness to EMSA it will also be hard to gather such data and marine safety experts will be quick to point out that most accidents are caused by a sequence of events and can seldom be attributed to one single person let alone a nationality.
Faced with an EU ban owners have basically two options, change officers or change flag.
As owners might not like the uncertainty of the 'officers they know' being replaced by the 'officer they do not know' they may resort to flagging out their ships to non-EU flag.
Furthermore from a commercial aspect - well by European owners/companies trained Filipino officers will be gladly hired by non-European Ship Managers, e.g. from China and/or Japan
Following scenario can happen in future - an EU Flag ship calling e.g. Hamburg, but deemed unsafe and non-compliant with Filipino officers, while another ship of the same owner but with Non-EU Flag calling the same port is deemed safe and compliant ! Will the Port State Control (PSC) inspectors be send in to level the playing field at the risk of escalation, increased uncertainty and many ships ending up detained?
Escalation is the least the industry needs right now.
In this sense the EMSA could do the Industry a great service with a scenario that continues to recognize the certificates of those officer who have already proven their competence on the EU flag. Then apply a ban only to new entrants and those without experience on EU Flag ships.
The EU will be damaging itself by putting EU ship owners at a competitive disadvantage all under the banner of Maritime Safety that is more likely to go down than go up.
Written by Stefan Schmitt
Back to Headlines✕
Back to Headlines✕
Customer is King
Pure personal opinion
Let me start with an analogy:
Germans love bread. Bakery is a necesity. In former times with local traditional bakeries, bread was sold out arund noon.
Nowadays, supermarkets have bread on the shelves until evening. Customer want that.
Unsold bread goes to food trash. Customers want that, too? I guess Customer doesn't really know and isn't really told. Lacking communication and transparency.
So what's with the half-baked story that Customer is King ?
Is it Customer is King ? - Hashtags
- Customer is King, ever heard that ?
- Customer Wants It That Way - All Hail The King
- A Stupid Customer - All Hail The King
- We are forced to do what Customer wants, because we are so dependent on their business
- We are forced to do what Customer wants, even though they hired us because of our specific expertise
It is of course every subordinates duty to follow the instruction of the boss.
Management makes the decisions.
Good management listens to opinions of its subordinates and then makes decisions.
That's within a company.
When it comes to intercation between companies, the interaction is between two managements.
One company contracts another company to buy outsourced experience.
Of course the experience is only then its worth if fully utilized.
Consensus building between managements is the key.
Our opinion
You don't trust the process?
Because you don't know the process?
Example young Jeff Bezos' amazon.com obsession to customer is king, but intransparently in hidden agenda collecting all customer personal data and making money on it.
secretly and eating up, like Jeff Bezos chita and gazelle's tactic, hurting the indutry
secretive explotation
or leading to explotation as result of enforced "customer is king"-attitude
hypocritical tropes
corrosive behavior
deserve proper advise
break through the opaque world of Crew Management.
Crewing typically accounts for 60% of a vessels OPEX
least understood area, financially challenged only by reducing head count onbard to minimum safe manning
The balance between crew performance, minimum manning, crew motivation
cost savings and operational efficiency
Lack of subject matter experts within organisations
Issues of entirely outsourced crew management, instead of outsourced processes
We use our years of expertise to expose marginal gains in the Crew Budget.
We work with your existing Crew Manager to realise cost efficiencies and work, in many instances, with the existing crew to optimise your
crewing spend on the vessel whilst also improving reporting and service levels.
Its not 'customer-is-king'. Its about good results that count.
Its not about approve or reject, its about consensus.
Its about the right to get proper and honest consulting.
The balance of being able to take time to reflect, and to prioritize your future while spending the majority of your day in the present, is beyond valuable, it's life changing.
Do what you love, love what you do.
Success is a series of moments (and choices) leading up to bigger moments.
Wikipedia 3Cs model
Written by Stefan Schmitt
Back to Headlines✕